3. Mr. Jackson owns several manufacturing plants and has just purchased a company that makes tire rims. The company has an OD department with three employees. Mr. Jackson doesn’t know anything about OD and he has asked you to design a study to see if OD really makes any difference. What do you propose?
2 page paper on New Advances in Understanding Sensitive Periods in Brain Development. Paper must have Evaluation, Reaction, and Application, and title page.
I have added picture to use for this assignment it just needs to be completed in text. I have listed instructions for this assignment below. The template to complete the work is in an atachment.
Instructions:
Relative to human history, the period covered in this week’s study is long. During this lengthy span of years, not only did people change in appearance, but the way they lived also changed radically. What we have found of their art and architecture also demonstrates an evolution in these areas.
Using your eBook, find one example of sculpture from each of the following periods: Paleolithic, Neolithic, and Bronze OR Iron Age.
View these sculpture pieces carefully. Capture an image of each of the three sculptures and place them in chronological order, from oldest to newest, in this template. Then, using information from your textbook, lectures, and other appropriate academic sources, provide the following regarding each image:
Create a six-slide, 12-minute presentation briefing a team on a potential ethical dilemma.
In the career for which you are preparing, where will you look for ethical guidance?
SHOW LESS
All of these overlapping concerns may create conflicted situations. Professional association codes of ethics commonly deal with a number of concerns:
No matter how extensively the professional code is spelled out, it cannot cover everything, and it often overemphasizes enforcement. It is more helpful to take a positive approach, thinking aspirationally about how best to handle challenging situations.
Questions to Consider
To deepen your understanding, you are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of the business community.
SHOW LESS
Assessment Overview
Imagine management at your future workplace tasks you with making a formal presentation to your team discussing a workplace ethical dilemma they might face. You consider an appropriate professional code of conduct, but only to the extent that it might offer useful guidance in this situation. The central task is to help everyone work together productively in resolving tricky issues.
For this assessment, fulfill the management task and create an audiovisual presentation that applies a professional code of ethics to common workplace situations. Submit your work as a narrated visual presentation in the courseroom submission box. You may develop a series of annotated PowerPoint slides, for example, using Kaltura to record the audio portion of your work. If you are more familiar with other presentation software, you may use that, so long as your submission satisfies all of the required elements of the assessment.
Assessment Instructions
Include the following in your narrated visual presentation:
Note: Include in your presentation slides or annotations a full APA-style citation of any quotation or paraphrase from the professional code or other sources you choose to employ.
Your instructor may provide video feedback on your work, in addition to completing the official scoring guide for the assignment.
Submit this assessment to your ePortfolio.
Additional Requirements
Ethics in the Workplace Scoring Guide
CRITERIA
NON-PERFORMANCE
BASIC
PROFICIENT
DISTINGUISHED
Apply a professional code of ethics to a workplace situation.
Does not apply a professional code of ethics to a workplace situation.
Explains a workplace situation in the context of a professional code of ethics.
Applies a professional code of ethics to a workplace situation.
Assesses an appropriate professional code of ethics as applied to a workplace situation.
Assess the advantages and disadvantages of a professional code of ethics.
Does not describe the advantages and disadvantages of a professional code of ethics.
Describes the advantages or disadvantages of a professional code of ethics, but not both.
Assesses the advantages and disadvantages of a professional code of ethics.
Analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of a professional code of ethics.
Explain methods for resolving ethical disagreements productively.
Does not mention methods for resolving ethical disagreements productively.
Mentions methods for resolving ethical disagreements productively.
Explains methods for resolving ethical disagreements productively.
Assesses methods for resolving ethical disagreements productively.
Describe areas of one’s personal disagreement with professional standards.
Does not describe areas of one’s personal disagreement with professional standards.
Lists areas of one’s personal disagreement with professional standards.
Describes areas of one’s personal disagreement with professional standards.
Explains areas of one’s personal disagreement with professional standards.
Create an audiovisual presentation that applies a professional code of ethics to a workplace situation.
Does not create an audiovisual presentation that applies a professional code of ethics to a workplace situation.
Creates an audiovisual presentation that applies a professional code of ethics, but the presentation lacks detail or does not reflect a workplace situation.
Creates an audiovisual presentation that applies a professional code of ethics to a workplace situation.
Creates an audiovisual presentation that applies a professional code of ethics to a workplace situations, and the presentation is engaging and detailed.
Will the internet and other devices increase in the future by putting the “secrecy” of the jury deliberation under threat?
Imagine you are an executive for an organization of your choice, and you are preparing a presentation for the board of directors about the organization’s direction.
Create a PowerPoint presentation (approximately 10 to 15 slides), with speaker notes, in which you address the following components:
Format your presentation consistent with APA guidelines. All sources used must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying in-text citations in the proper APA format. Use at least one scholarly article from the CSU Online Library.
Instructions:
Write a page on what precautions can business owners or corporate executives take in order to safeguard against potential criminal activity within their businesses organization?
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
Review the following lecture:
An employee believes that management has violated one or more provisions of a collective bargaining agreement. A union has filed a grievance on behalf of the employee. As the HR director, you will be representing the organization. For this project, you will explain how you will prepare for the grievance meeting and how you will identify the steps in the grievance procedure. Review a collective bargaining agreement on the United States Department of Labor website or a collective bargaining agreement for a Teacher’s Association (search the Internet for the Teacher’s Association). Select an article from the collective bargaining agreement to analyze for this project.
To support your work, use your course and textbook readings and also use the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.
Attached are screenshots of the answers that I got wrong on the exam. You‘ll see that I received no points for each of those question. Secondly, there are some answers that I positively knew were right therefore I DID NOT change them based on the answer key I bought and luckily I didn’t change my initial answers because they were correct. So in actuality, there’s more than just a just few wrong answers on the answer key that I purchased.
Overview
Captain Crozier, Commander of the USS Theodore Roosevelt, wrote and distributed a controversial letter that pleaded for help for crew members stricken by the Covid-19 virus in March of 2020. The communication was sent to several recipients and eventually found its way to the news media. The situation became front-page news and was actively debated in the media. Senior leaders believed that Captain Crozier may have avoided his chain of command for fear that his immediate leader would suppress the issue and expose the sailors to unnecessary danger. His decisions and actions that lead up to his writing of the letter are fraught with ethical dilemmas.
In this assessment, you are asked to analyze the ethical aspects surrounding Captain Crozier’s decision to widely disseminate the letter.
Preparation
Thoroughly research the issues using the Internet and the articles provided in Resources. You may need to conduct additional research to support your analysis.
As you can see by your research, there is a lot going on behind the scenes in this scenario. However, it is clear that the Captain of the USS Theodore Roosevelt was facing a difficult ethical situation and tried to find the best way to communicate his concerns. There are many questions that likely come to mind, such as:
What was the dilemma facing the Captain? How might he have weighed his decision?
Should the Captain have sent the message? Why or why not?
Was the content of the communication appropriate, taking into the consideration the recipient(s) of the letter? Did he distribute the letter for maximum effect?
What should he have done differently?
Did the Captain violate Navy ethical guidelines? Are his actions at odds with communication guidelines? Is that how he should be judged?
Was his punishment justified?
How do you think his crew felt? Is that relevant?
Instructions
Consider the Captain’s decision to send the letter, the manner in which the letter was sent, and the recipient(s) of the letter. Complete both parts of this assessment in a single Word document.
PART 1: ANALYZE THE SCENARIO
Analyze the ethical decision that the Captain faced as it relates to how he communicated his plea and in the context of his position. Consider the sender, receiver, message, and channel.
Analyze the primary failures and successes of the Captain’s communication strategy. Make sure to consider how the letter was distributed, the Captain’s possible intent, and the content of the letter.
If this situation had occurred in the private sector and not the military, would the outcomes have been similar or different? Defend your reasoning.
PART 2: WRITE A COMMUNICATION
Imagine that you were the commanding officer of another naval ship who had followed this sequence of events closely. Your ship’s Public Affairs Officer reports to you and is responsible for many of the ship’s external communications, and you are anxious to share your lessons learned from the USS Theodore Roosevelt situation.
Send a communication to your Public Affairs Officer that conveys and re-enforces the primary lesson(s) learned from the incident on the USS Theodore Roosevelt. Be sure you focus on the actions of the Captain. The medium is your choice, but it is also very important, so state the medium you have chosen within your message and the reason you feel it is the most appropriate medium to use. Address possible reasons such as confidentiality, tone, convention, et cetera.
Additional Requirements
Complete both parts of this assessment in a single Word document.
Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA style and formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting standards.
Font: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Length: Part 1 should be 3–4 pages, double spaced, and Part 2 should be 1 page, double spaced. Page count does not include your cover page or reference page.
Cited resources: Use a minimum of three scholarly sources. All literature cited should be current, with publication dates within the past five years.
