Read Chapter 14 in Alligood (2022). Orem states there is a need for a nursing language that is enabling for thinking nursing and articulating with other disciplines and for communicating nursing to others in nursing practice situations.
Describe what you think it means to “think nursing?”
Give an example of nursing language and describe how it is effective for nursing communication.
What barriers have you experienced in communicating nursing to others?
Read Chapter 15 in Alligood (2022). King discusses the goal setting process.
Share a clinical experience where goal setting was or would have been helpful.
What consequences did you experience because of missed goals?
What level of insistence can a nurse use for pursuit of a goal?
Reference in APA format and use NARRATIVE FORM. PLEASE USE RUBIC
Reference
Alligood, M.R. (2022). Nursing theorists and their work (10th ed.). Elsevier.
NUR – 600Discussion Forum Rubric
Criteria | Ratings | ||
Quality of First Post | 50 pts – Full CreditInformation clearly relates to the main topic and adds new concepts, information, it includes several supporting details and/or examples | 25 pts – Partial CreditInformation relates to the main topic, but lacking detail, depth, and/or examples | 0 pts – No CreditInformation has little or nothing to do with the main topic or simply restates the main concept without supporting details/examples |
Professional Language and Writing | 5 pts – Full CreditProfessional vocabulary, correct grammar, and correct spelling are consistently used throughout the discussion | 2 pts – Partial CreditThree or less errors in professional vocabulary, grammar and spelling are identified in the discussion post | 0 pts – No CreditFour of more errors in professional vocabulary, grammar and spelling are identified in the discussion post |
APA Format | 10 pts – Full CreditCorrect APA format consistently used throughout discussion posts | 5 pts – Partial CreditNo more than two errors in APA format are identified in the discussion posts | 0 pts – No CreditThree or more errors in APA format are identified within the discussion posts or no reference list is provided |
Quality of Second Post | 30 pts – Full CreditInformation clearly relates to the main topic (original students post) and adds new concepts, information, and includes several supporting details and/or examples | 15 pts – Partial CreditInformation relates to the main topic (original students post) but lacking detail, depth, and/or examples | 0 pts – No CreditInformation has little or nothing to do with the main topic (original students post) or simply restates the main concept without supporting details/examples |
Professional Language and Writing | 5 pts – Full CreditProfessional vocabulary, correct grammar, and correct spelling are consistently used when commenting on another student’s response | 2 pts – Partial CreditProfessional vocabulary, correct grammar, and correct spelling are consistently used when commenting on another student’s response | 0 pts – No CreditFour or more errors in professional vocabulary, grammar and spelling are identified when commenting on another student’s response |
Timeliness | 0 pts – Full Credit | 0 pts – Partial Credit | 0 pts – No Credit |
Total Points: 100 |