Developmental Teaching Plan

Instructions:
Develop a teaching plan based on an assigned scenario or case. Determine what elements you would include in your assessment of the learner. Identify anticipated or expected learner needs. Select and prioritize evidence-based teaching strategies that would best meet the needs of the learner. Describe the resources you would provide to enhance learning. Explain methods that would be used to evaluate learning outcomes. Provide rationales for elements of your teaching plan supported by references from the required course reading assignments. Use the teaching plan format assigned. The competencies contained in the Teaching Plan Rubric will be assessed through this assignment.

Teaching plan paper format Total 4-6 pages 1-Title Page (APA format) 2-SBAR report on the patient(Brief and concise) 3- Begin the actual paper to include all parts on the rubric, including a conclusion. (APA format) 4- Reference page (APA format) Minimal 2-3 references including a professional organization for the illness/condition.

Family Nurse Practitioner as Health Promoter based on the Health Promoter and Disease Prevention Theoretical Model

  

  • Prepare a PowerPoint presentation explaining the role of the  Family Nurse Practitioner as Health Promoter based on the Health Promoter and Disease Prevention Theoretical Model. No less than 12-15 slice – cover and reference not counted to a total of slides count. Avoid plagiarism.

12-15 SLICE MORE RESUME THAN THE EXAMPLE.

I NEED ON 6 HS

I ADD AND EXAMPLE

Soap Note : ” Prostate Cancer “

 

Assignments turned in late will have 1 point taken off for every day assignment is late, after 7 days assignment will get grade of 0. No exceptions Follow the MRU Soap Note Rubric as a guide
Use APA format and must include minimum of 2 Scholarly Citations.
Soap notes will be uploaded to Moodle and put through TURN-It-In (anti-Plagiarism program)
Turn it in Score must be less than 50% or will not be accepted for credit, must be your own work and in your own words. You can resubmit, Final submission will be accepted if less than 50%. Copy paste from websites or textbooks will not be accepted or tolerated. Please see College Handbook with reference to Academic Misconduct Statement.The use of tempates is ok with regards of Turn it in, but the Patient History, CC, HPI, The Assessment and Plan should be of your own work and individualized to your made up patient.  

Discussion NR

1 page max discussion, please follow the guidelines from the document uploaded to answer all questions and please make sure is 100% plagiarism free, apa 7th ed., at least 2 in text citations. I need it fast the latest by Monday morning. 

HOMEWORK

 

A 23-year-old male patient is admitted with a fracture of C6 and C7 that has resulted in quadriplegia. He was injured during a football game at the university where he is currently a senior. His career as a quarterback had been very promising. At the time of the injury, contract negotiations were in progress with a leading professional football team.

1. Use Roy’s criteria to identify focal and contextual stimuli for each of the four adaptive modes.

2. Consider what adaptations would be necessary in each of the following four adaptive modes: (1) physiological, (2) self-concept, (3) interdependence, and (4) role function.

3. Create a nursing intervention for each of the adaptive modes to promote adaptation.

Nursing Specialty PowerPoint Presentation ( Nurse Practioner)

  

Your presentation must include the following components:

  • Your Preferred/desired specialty (nurse PractitionerNurse)
  • Description of the specialty
  • The education required for the specialty
  • Professional organizations that are available in your specialty
  • The target population for the specialty, their needs, and comorbidities
  • The availability of your specialty in your community and the mission of the organizations (I live in Minnesota)
  • Describe and discuss culturally competent care and/or developmental competence within the client population
  • Explain how each of the QSEN competencies (patient-centered care, teamwork and collaboration, evidence-based practice, informatics, quality improvement, and safety) are utilized throughout your specialty or with the target population
  • Create a scenario within your specialty, include 2-3 questions for the class to answer
  • Create a SMART goal related to your specialty’s main  goal

include APA reference citation as indicated

my specialty of interest is Nurse Practitioner, and live in Minnesota 

Assignment: Lab Assignment: Assessing the Genitalia and Rectum

 

  • Analyze the subjective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.
  • Analyze the objective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.
  • Is the assessment supported by the subjective and objective information? Why or why not?
  • Would diagnostics be appropriate for this case, and how would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
  • Would you reject/accept the current diagnosis? Why or why not?  Identify three possible conditions that may be considered as a  differential diagnosis for this patient. Explain your reasoning using at  least three different references from current evidence-based  literature.

W#13 Peer and Self Reflection Assignment

This assignment should only be completed after you have posted the video: SEE ATTACHED VIDEO LINK: Geriatric Safety Planning therapy video

VIDEO LINK: https://youtu.be/CFPtmGmureM

Your reflection should address all of the following questions between 750 to 950 words. Appropriate spelling, grammar, and punctuation required. Complete sentences are expected. All writing should be in your own words. Use APA references as needed to support your ideas; there is no requirement on number of references to include. Be sure to use APA format.

  1. Which skills did you use in the session? How?
  2. How did the assigned Corey readings, PowerPoints, Handouts, and videos inform your therapy session? Please explain in detail.
  3. What were your strengths in the interview?
  4. What were your weaknesses/areas in need of further development in the interview?
  5. How could you improve your interviewing skills? Are there steps you plan on taking? What are those steps?
  6. Was there any time when you felt stuck or uncertain how to respond? Describe what was happening then. Were there times you felt more confident in your responses with the client? Times you were less confident? How? Does this come through in the session?
  7. How were you impacted by the client…your emotions, thoughts, physical reactions, transference, and countertransference, body language?
  8. What was your overall response to the interview? Did you feel connected to the client? Distracted? Disengaged?
  9. What was the quality of your engagement, your empathy?
  10. If you were to continue seeing this particular client, what future directions would you take? How would you conceptualize the case and what would be some of your treatment goals? How would you pursue these goals?

In relation to your partner:

  1. What were the partners strengths in the interview?
  2. What were the partners weaknesses/areas in need of further development in the interview?
  3. How could your partner improve his/her interviewing skills?

Please, see also the attached assignment example for references.Background: I live in South Florida, I am currently enrolled in the Psych Mental Health Practitioner Program, I am a Registered Nurse, I work in a Psychiatric Hospital.

Assignment: Structural Versus Strategic Family Therapies

 

In a 2- to 3-page paper, address the following:

  • Summarize the key points of both structural family therapy and strategic family therapy.
  • Compare structural family therapy to strategic family therapy, noting the strengths and weaknesses of each.
  • Provide an example of a family in your practicum using a structural family map (GENOGRAM) Note: Be sure to maintain HIPAA regulations.
  • Recommend a specific therapy for the family, and justify your choice using the Learning Resources.

 

Rubric:

The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.–

Excellent 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)Good 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)Fair 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)Poor 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.–

Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.–

Excellent 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)Good 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)Fair 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Poor 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.–

Excellent 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)Good 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Fair 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Poor 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.–

Excellent 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)Good 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Fair 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Poor 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

Written Expression and Formatting

Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.–

Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Written Expression and Formatting

English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–

Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Written Expression and Formatting

The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–

Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)