case study

 Review the following case study and complete the questions that follow. Submit your completed document to Blackboard using the assignment link.

As a nurse practicing within a family practice, you are interviewing a 55-year-old woman who is an executive assistant at a local law firm, where she has worked for 9 years. She has a 7-year history of respiratory illness, which occurs several times throughout the year, not seemingly connected to the changes in season. She does not use tobacco products in any form. During your questions regarding her home and work environments, she reports that she enjoys working adjacent to the courthouse in a building over 100 years old because it is such a contrast to her brand-new home on a local golf course. When describing the health of her coworkers, she indicates, “We all share illnesses, which seem to affect everyone else during the year; we just seem to be sicker more often!”

  • What information is pertinent to your client’s case?
  • How would you assess your client’s risk?
  • What would be an exposure pathway for your client?

Your document should be 2 pages in length, in APA format, typed in Times New Roman with 12-point font, double-spaced with 1” margins, and include at least two citations using references less than five years old.

class4wk6asng

 

The purpose of this assignment is to document sources of research evidence that address a national practice problem, including the level and quality of each source of research evidence. A synthesis of the evidence is conducted to determine the overall strength and quality of the evidence. The development of an evidence table and synthesis are foundational to inform actions and decisions to improve healthcare outcomes. Construction of an evidence table and synthesis supports professional formation of the DNP practice scholar.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

  • Compare and contrast differences and similarities of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method designs. (POs 3, 9)
  • Analyze qualitative and quantitative data for the purposes of critical appraisal of evidence. (POs 3, 9)
  • Appraise systematic reviews for translation science. (POs 3, 5, 9)
  • Evaluate selected statistical methods for the purposes of critical appraisal of evidence. (POs 3, 5, 9)
  • Synthesize literature relevant to practice problems. (POs 3, 5, 9) 

PRACTICE PROBLEM WAS:  UNDER DIAGNOSIS OF DIABETES: CAUSE, EFFECTS AND RISK FACTORS

TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS: 300

Preparing The Assignment

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of this assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions. It is each student’s responsibility to save and maintain all artifacts required in the e-Portfolio (Links to an external site.).

  1. The assignment will include the following components.
    1. Title Page
    2. Introduction
      1. Purpose Statement
      2. Practice Problem Identification (identified in Weeks 1, 2, and 3 Discussion) (cited)
      3. Sources of Research Evidence Identification (identified in Weeks 1, 2, and 3 Discussion) (cited)
    3. Implications of the Practice Problem at the National Level and Local Level (1–2 paragraphs)
      1. Significance
      2. Prevalence
      3. Economic Ramifications
    4. Synthesis of Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem, Including 2 Qualitative Research Studies, 2 Quantitative Research Studies, and 2 Systemactic Reviews (identified in Weeks 1, 2, and 3 Discussions) (2 paragraphs)
      1. Main Points/Salient Messages That Emerge From the Sources (Cited)
      2. Compare and Contrast Main Points From All Sources (Cited)
      3. Objective Discussion of Facts
    5. Appraisal of the Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem (1–2 paragraphs)
      1. Level of Evidence
      2. Quality Rating of Evidence
      3. Suitability of the Evidence to Address the Practice Problem
    6. Summary Tables of Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem Using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Evidence Summary Tool (Links to an external site.)
      1. 2 Qualitative Research Studies (identified in Week 1 Discussion)
      2. 2 Quantitative Research Studies (identified in Week 2 Discussion)
      3. 2 Systematic Reviews (identified in Week 3 Discussion)
    7. Conclusion
      1. Summation of the Impact of the Practice Problem at the National Level and Local Level
      2. Summation of the Appraisal of Evidence to Address the Practice Problem
      3. Summation of the Evidence Synthesis
    8. References
      1. Reference Page With Complete References for the 6 Sources of Research Evidence
    9. APA Style and Organization
      1. APA Standards for Scholarly Papers
      2. Grammar and Mechanics
      3. Level I Headings are included

All Chamberlain University policies related to plagiarism must be observed. This written assignment will be screened for originality by Turnitin.

Rubric

Week 6—Evidence Synthesis Grading RubricWeek 6—Evidence Synthesis Grading RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroductionRequirements 1. Includes a focused purpose statement 2. Identifies selected practice problem 3. Identifies sources of research evidence30.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 3 requirements.26.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 2 requirements23.0 ptsIncludes no less than 1 requirements.0.0 ptsNo requirements for this section presented.30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplications of the Practice Problem at the National Level and Local LevelRequirements 1. Describes the significance of the practice problem at the national level and local level 2. Discusses the prevalence of the practice problem at the national level and local level 3. Discusses the economic ramifications of the practice problem at the national level and local level40.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 3 requirements35.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 2 requirements31.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 1 requirement0.0 ptsNo requirements for this section presented40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence SynthesisRequirements 1. Describes scope of the evidence synthesis 2. Discusses the main points of sources (sources are cited) 3. Describes the relationship of sources to other selected sources (sources are cited) 4. Discusses facts objectively 5. Presents ideas and claims (sources are cited)50.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 5 requirements43.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 4 requirements38.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 2 requirements0.0 ptsNo requirements for this section presented50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence AppraisalRequirements 1. Describes the levels of evidence 2. Discusses the quality of evidence 3. Discusses the suitability of the evidence to address the practice problem50.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 3 requirements43.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 2 requirements38.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 1 requirement0.0 ptsNo requirements for this section presented50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence Summary ToolRequirements 1 Provides complete summary for first qualitative research study 2 Provides complete summary for second qualitative research study 3 Provides complete summary for first quantitative research study 4 Provides complete summary for second quantitative research study 5 Provides complete summary for first systematic review 6 Provides complete summary for second systematic review40.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 6 requirements35.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 5 requirements31.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 4 requirements0.0 ptsNo requirements for this section presented40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusionRequirements 1. Includes a summation of the impact of the practice problem at the national level 2. Includes a summation of the evidence appraisal 3. Includes a summation of the evidence synthesis30.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 3 requirements26.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 2 requirements23.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 1 requirement0.0 ptsNo requirements for this section presented30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferencesRequirements 1. Cites and references for 6 selected sources of evidence30.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 6 complete references26.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 5 complete references23.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 4 complete references0.0 ptsNo requirements for this section presented30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style and OrganizationRequirements 1. Uses APA standards for scholarly papers 2. Grammar and mechanics are free of errors 3. Uses required evidence summary table 4. Uses required Level I Headings30.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 4 requirements26.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 3 requirements23.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 1 requirement0.0 ptsNo requirements for this section presented30.0 pts
Total Points: 300.0PreviousNext
 

Essay two to three pages

 

Based upon your reading of Dr. Christina Sommers’ article on Virtue Ethics and & the video lecture by Tamar Gendler on the same topic, write a 2 to 3 page essay (double-spaced; MS doc file or rtf) answering the questions given in the instructions.  You must support your analysis with at least two short quotations from the reading and/or video, properly notated.   Proper MLA or APA in text citations are required.  Each quotation must be no more than 40 words.  Topic Instructions are given below. 

Instructions:

Based upon your reading of Dr. Christina Sommers’ article on Virtue Ethics & the video lecture by Tamar Gendler on the same, write a 2 to 3 page essay (double-spaced) on what virtue ethics is and how each of these philosophers explains it.   You will need to answer the following questions: According to Sommers, what is the main problem today and what is her basic answer both in terms of content and scope?  And then, from the lecture by Dr. Gendler, explain how we can turn normative commitments into descriptive laws and what does it mean to do that, according to her explanation of Aristotle’s virtue ethics (video link)?  Do you think it is fair to say that virtue ethics, as Tamar Gendler explains this moral theory, is a type of human programming and, if so, does this view challenge or undercut the idea of good human behavior as a matter of choice rather than response without thought?   Explain.  Do you think this approach of Professor Gendler to how virtue ethics becomes part of us goes along with Professor Sommers’ thesis on what is needed in schools today or not?  Explain.  Finally, what part of Christina Sommers’ analysis and proposal you find convincing, if any, and what part of it, if any, do you find questionable?

ICARE Paper oncology outpatient

  • For this assignment, consider the concept of interprofessional teamwork and patient outcomes.
    • Look to your current workplace as an example. (If you are not currently employed, look to a past workplace or clinical practice area.)
    • Apply the components of the iCARE concept to interprofessional teams in a short paper. (Body of the paper to be 3 pages, excluding the title page and references page)
    • iCARE components are:
      • C ompassion
      • A dvocacy
      • R esilience
      • E vidence-Based Practice (EBP)
    • How could you contribute to an interprofessional team and patient outcomes through nursing actions of: compassion, advocacy, resilience, and evidence-based practice?
  1. Select one scholarly nursing article from CINAHL as a resource for your paper.
    • Additional scholarly sources can be used but are optional.
    • When searching in the CINAHL database, please limit your search word to one component of the paper you wish to emphasize, such as ‘Resilience’.  Searching for the term iCARE will not produce the results you need.
  2. Elements of iCARE paper
    • Title page
    • Below are the headings to be used for this assignment. 
      • Introduction: (No heading needed here in APA) Explain the type of work setting you are discussing and whether interprofessional teams are currently present. If interprofessional teams are present, indicate a team function that could be improved. If interprofessional teams are NOT present, indicate what type of team you think might be possible in the setting.
      • Describe a nursing action item for each component below that could contribute to: interprofessional team support; how this might impact the culture of your unit or organization; and possible impact on patient outcomes.
        • Compassion
        • Advocacy
        • Resilience
        • Evidence-Based Practice
      • Summary: Include a summary statement of how iCARE components can support interprofessional teams and patient outcomes. Address how you may be able to influence this process of support for interprofessional teams overall in your unit or organization.
      • References: List any references used in APA format.

Tomorrow

The four principles, especially in the context of bioethics in the United States, has often been critiqued for raising the principle of autonomy to the highest place, such that it trumps all other principles or values. How would you rank the importance of each of the four principles? How do you believe they would be ordered in the context of the Christian biblical narrative? Refer to the topic study materials in your response.

Tomorrow November 3 

Strategic Planning

 

Develop a 5–10-year strategic plan for achieving specific health care quality and safety improvements, based on the analysis you completed in Assessment 1. Use either an AI approach or your SWOT analysis and a chosen strategic planning model.

Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

Evaluation of strategic choices is important. The methods for selecting strategic alternatives help leaders organize significant issues to support decision making. However, it is important that the techniques do not make the decision. Rather, leaders should use the techniques to reveal the inherent situation and to organize their thought processes. This assessment provides you with an opportunity to evaluate and apply some of the techniques for successful strategy development and implementation.

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

  • Competency 1: Evaluate qualities and skills that promote effective leadership within health care organizations.
    • Evaluate the leadership qualities and skills that will be most important to successfully implementing a strategic plan and sustaining strategic direction.
  • Competency 2: Apply strategies to lead high-performing health care teams to meet organizational quality and safety goals.
    • Develop strategic goal statements and outcomes that support the achievement of specific quality and safety improvements for a care setting.
    • Justify the relevance of proposed strategic goals and outcomes in relation to the mission, vision, and values of a care setting.
  • Competency 3: Apply cultural, ethical, and regulatory considerations to leadership decision making.
    • Analyze the extent to which strategic goals and outcomes address the use of technology and the ethical, cultural, and regulatory environments.
  • Competency 4: Integrate leadership and health care theories into the role of the nurse leader.
    • Explain how relevant leadership and health care theories will be used to help achieve proposed strategic goals and objectives.
  • Competency 5: Communicate with stakeholders and constituencies to build collaborative partnerships and create inclusive work environments.
    • Communicate analyses clearly and in a way that demonstrates professionalism and respect for stakeholders and colleagues.
    • Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

 

As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.

Strategic planning models aid in setting goals, establishing time frames, and forging a path toward achieving those goals. Consider the strategic planning models you are familiar with:

  • Which model would you choose to create goals and outcomes that could address the area of concern you identified in your Assessment 1 SWOT analysis?
  • Why is this model the best choice among alternatives?
  • How does goal setting through appreciative inquiry provocative propositions differ from goal setting in the strategic planning model you selected?

 

Assessment Instructions

Note: You will use your care setting environmental analysis as the basis for developing your strategic plan in this assessment.

Preparation

The feedback you received on your care setting environmental analysis has been positive. Consequently, you have been asked to select one of the potential improvement projects you noted in your analysis and create a full, 5–10-year strategic plan to achieve the desired quality and safety improvement outcomes. You will develop your strategic plan, using either an AI approach (addressing the design stage), or by building on your SWOT analysis and applying a strategic planning model of your choice.

How you structure your plan should be based on whether you are taking an appreciative inquiry approach or using a specific strategic planning model. Regardless of the approach you choose, the requester of the plan has asked that you address the key points outlined below in the strategic plan requirements. In addition, your plan should be 5–8 pages in length.

Note: Remember, you can submit all, or a portion, of your draft plan to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service.

Requirements

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so at a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

Writing, Supporting Evidence, and APA Style
  • Write clearly, with professionalism and respect for stakeholders and colleagues.
  • Integrate relevant sources of evidence to support your assertions.
    • Cite at least 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence.
  • Format your document using APA style. An APA Style Paper Template and associated tutorial, linked in the Resources, are provided for your use. Be sure to include:
    • A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.
    • A running head on all pages.
    • Appropriate section headings.
    • Properly formatted citations and references.
  • Proofread your writing to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult to focus on the substance of your analysis.

Strategic Plan

  • Develop strategic goal statements and outcomes that reflect specific quality and safety improvements for your care setting. You should have at least one short-term goal (just-in-time to one year) and one long-term goal (five years or longer).
    • Determine realistic timelines for achieving your goals.
    • Explain how your short-term goals support your long-term goals.

Note: For plans based on an AI approach, the goal statements and outcomes are provocative propositions that may be refinements of the positive, yet attainable, goals that you proposed during the dream phase of your inquiry. For plans based on a SWOT analysis, the goal statements and outcomes are specific, measurable, and applicable to the area of concern in your analysis for which you proposed pursuing improvements.

  • Justify the relevance of your proposed strategic goals and outcomes in relation to the mission, vision, and values of your care setting.
  • Analyze the extent to which your strategic goals and outcomes, and your approach to achieving them, address:
    • The ethical environment.
    • The cultural environment.
    • The use of technology.
    • Applicable health care policies, laws, and regulations.
  • Explain, in general, how you will use relevant leadership and health care theories to help achieve your proposed strategic goals and outcomes.
    • Consider whether different theories are more applicable to the short-term or long-term goals of your strategic plan.
  • Evaluate the leadership qualities and skills that are most important to successfully implementing your proposed plan and sustaining strategic direction.
    • Identify those leadership qualities and skills that are essential to achieving your goals and outcomes and sustaining strategic direction.
    • Identify those leadership qualities and skills that will have the greatest effect on the success of your plan.

 

Assessment Instructions

Note: You will use your care setting environmental analysis as the basis for developing your strategic plan in this assessment.

Preparation

The feedback you received on your care setting environmental analysis has been positive. Consequently, you have been asked to select one of the potential improvement projects you noted in your analysis and create a full, 5–10-year strategic plan to achieve the desired quality and safety improvement outcomes. You will develop your strategic plan, using either an AI approach (addressing the design stage), or by building on your SWOT analysis and applying a strategic planning model of your choice.

How you structure your plan should be based on whether you are taking an appreciative inquiry approach or using a specific strategic planning model. Regardless of the approach you choose, the requester of the plan has asked that you address the key points outlined below in the strategic plan requirements. In addition, your plan should be 5–8 pages in length.

Note: Remember, you can submit all, or a portion, of your draft plan to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service.

Requirements

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so at a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

Writing, Supporting Evidence, and APA Style
  • Write clearly, with professionalism and respect for stakeholders and colleagues.
  • Integrate relevant sources of evidence to support your assertions.
    • Cite at least 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence.
  • Format your document using APA style. An APA Style Paper Template and associated tutorial, linked in the Resources, are provided for your use. Be sure to include:
    • A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.
    • A running head on all pages.
    • Appropriate section headings.
    • Properly formatted citations and references.
  • Proofread your writing to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult to focus on the substance of your analysis.

Strategic Plan

  • Develop strategic goal statements and outcomes that reflect specific quality and safety improvements for your care setting. You should have at least one short-term goal (just-in-time to one year) and one long-term goal (five years or longer).
    • Determine realistic timelines for achieving your goals.
    • Explain how your short-term goals support your long-term goals.

Note: For plans based on an AI approach, the goal statements and outcomes are provocative propositions that may be refinements of the positive, yet attainable, goals that you proposed during the dream phase of your inquiry. For plans based on a SWOT analysis, the goal statements and outcomes are specific, measurable, and applicable to the area of concern in your analysis for which you proposed pursuing improvements.

  • Justify the relevance of your proposed strategic goals and outcomes in relation to the mission, vision, and values of your care setting.
  • Analyze the extent to which your strategic goals and outcomes, and your approach to achieving them, address:
    • The ethical environment.
    • The cultural environment.
    • The use of technology.
    • Applicable health care policies, laws, and regulations.
  • Explain, in general, how you will use relevant leadership and health care theories to help achieve your proposed strategic goals and outcomes.
    • Consider whether different theories are more applicable to the short-term or long-term goals of your strategic plan.
  • Evaluate the leadership qualities and skills that are most important to successfully implementing your proposed plan and sustaining strategic direction.
    • Identify those leadership qualities and skills that are essential to achieving your goals and outcomes and sustaining strategic direction.
    • Identify those leadership qualities and skills that will have the greatest effect on the success of your plan.

GRADING RUBRIC: 

1-  Develop strategic goal statements and outcomes that support the achievement of specific quality and safety improvements for a care setting. 

Passing Grade:  Develops strategic goal statements and outcomes that support the achievement of specific quality and safety improvements for a care setting, and impartially considers potential barriers. 

2-  Justify the relevance of proposed strategic goals and outcomes in relation to the mission, vision, and values of a care setting. 

Passing Grade:  Justifies the relevance of proposed strategic goals and outcomes in relation to the mission, vision, and values of a care setting, and identifies areas of uncertainty or knowledge gaps. 

3-  Analyze the extent to which strategic goals and outcomes address the use of technology and the ethical, cultural, and regulatory environments. 

Passing Grade:  Analyzes the extent to which strategic goals and outcomes address the use of technology and the ethical, cultural, and regulatory environments. Impartially considers the limitations of the goals and outcomes. 

4-  Explain how relevant leadership and health care theories will be used to help achieve proposed strategic goals and objectives. 

Passing Grade:  Explains how relevant leadership and health care theories will be used to help achieve proposed strategic goals and objectives, and identifies gaps, limitations, or mismatches in theories. 

5-  Evaluate the leadership qualities and skills that will be most important to successfully implementing a strategic plan and sustaining strategic direction. 

Passing Grade:  Evaluates the leadership qualities and skills that will be most important to successfully implementing a strategic plan and sustaining strategic direction, and identifies assumptions underlying the evaluation. 

6-  Communicate analyses clearly and in a way that demonstrates professionalism and respect for stakeholders and colleagues. 

Passing Grade:  Communicates analyses clearly, logically, and persuasively, demonstrating professionalism and respect for stakeholders and colleagues. Grammar and mechanics are virtually error-free. 

7-  Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style. 

Passing Grade:  Integrates relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style. Citations are error-free. 

week 8 capstone journal

Bi-weekly Practicum Journaling

Every two weeks, you will submit a reflective journal to the discussion forum for review by course faculty and your classmates. All are expected to engage and support one another by sharing these experiences in a supportive, constructive, professional environment. Journaling is an active learning technique that is meant to enhance reflective practice (Blake, 2005). Reflective practice involves looking back over what has happened in the practice setting in an effort to improve performance or to encourage professional growth (Ruth-Sahd, 2003).

Your Weekly Practicum Journal is:

  • A personal, introspective subjective account of your practicum experience and how your practicum experience relates to Healthy People 2020 and course objectives. Include events that occurred in your practicum experience, and be sure to describe your thoughts and feelings about those events.  How did your perceptions change? What did you learn that was unexpected? Describe your thinking about your thoughts and feelings regarding the new learning you experienced.
  • Connected to South University’s College of Nursing Conceptual Framework Pillars (Caring, Communication, Critical Thinking, Professionalism, and Holism)
  • Connected to prior coursework and experiences through reflective analysis.
  • Written in a scholarly, academic style using APA style format. Two or three sentences are not sufficient nor are daily logs/reports of activities.

Citations should conform to APA guidelines. You may use this APA Citation Helper as a convenient reference for properly citing resources or connect to the APA Style website.

the assignment has to be on a diabetic/hypertensive patient admitted to a cardiac/ telemetry floor. re-admitted because of uncontrolled diabetes and hypertension. 

class3wk7d1

Minimum of 350 words with at least 2 peer review reference in 7th edition apa style.

 THIS IS A DOCTORATE DEGREE IN NURSING PROGRAM 

Porter-O’Grady and Malloch (2018) observed, “Globalization has created a world community and removed traditional boundaries between people, be they political, social, or physical” (p. 9).

Select one of the boundaries (political, social, or physical) and address the following.

  • How does the boundary affect your practice or have the potential to affect your practice? Provide examples.
  • As a leader, how can you have an impact on overcoming that boundary? Provide examples.
  • What interprofessional relationships can you foster that can contribute to overcoming the boundary? Be specific and provide rationale.
  • How will you leverage resources to overcome the selected boundary?

Name Your Leadership Style (for Mrs Lynn eyes only)

Name your Leadership Style

Discussions play an integral role in monitoring your course participation throughout the term. Be sure to appropriately cite any sources you use to support your responses with standard APA citations. Answer the prompt question(s) thoroughly using a minimum of 150-200 words.

Discussion Prompt: 

  1. Please discuss/include the following in a minimum of 150-200 words for your initial post:
  • Now that we have reached the end of our course, you will have the opportunity to create and name your version of leadership style, theory, or philosophy. As you create your leadership concept, take each of the following into consideration:
    • Review and reflect on the difference between all of the research based versions we have studied in our course. 
    • Reflect back on your working definition of leadership from Week 1 and Week 4 consider how the other concepts you have learned compliment your definition or have given you new insights you want to incorporate.
    • Share with the group what your final definition of leadership