ESTEF-PP

Strengths, Challenges, Opportunities and Threats (SCOT) is a simple yet comprehensive way of assessing the positive and negative forces within and outside your organization so you can be better prepared to act effectively. It reminds the project leader to build on strengths, minimize challenges, seize opportunities, and counteract threats.

Assignment Prompt

Each student will perform a SCOT (formerly SWOT) analysis in their practice that identifies strengths, challenges, opportunities and threats to assist in making strategic plans and decisions in the implementation of the EBP.

Submit a 1-2 slide PowerPoint presentation of a SCOT analysis as it relates to your project.

  • Format: Power Point with diagram
  • Research: At least one peer reviewed reference within the last 5 years
  • NO PLAGIO MORE THAN 10%
  • DUE DATE MARCH 19, 2025

weekly clinical experience 1

Describe your clinical experience for this week.

  • Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they?
  • Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales.
  • Mention the health promotion intervention for this patient.
  • What did you learn from this week’s clinical experience that can beneficial for you as an advanced practice nurse?
  • Support your plan of care with the current peer-reviewed research guideline.

Submission Instructions:

  • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources published within the last five years.

Weekly Clinical Experience 1

Describe your clinical experience for this week.

 Must be on Geriatric Patient

  • Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they?
  • Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales.
  • Mention the health promotion intervention for this patient.
  • What did you learn from this week’s clinical experience that can beneficial for you as an advanced practice nurse?
  • Support your plan of care with the current peer-reviewed research guideline.

Submission Instructions:

  • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources

Diff RN roles

 

Compare the primary care NP role with other APN roles. What are the similarities among the roles, what are the differences, and how would you communicate the role to a healthcare provider and a consumer?

Submission Instructions:

  • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points. 

References not older than 6 years

i will have to submit it to turn it in

no chat gbt 

rubric

 

Discussion Rubric

Discussion Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts

5 ptsDistinguished
Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.

4 ptsExcellent
Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.

2 ptsFair
Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.

1 ptsPoor
Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

3 ptsDistinguished
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.

2 ptsExcellent
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.

1 ptsFair
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

0 ptsPoor
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponse to Posts of Peers

2 ptsDistinguished
Student constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each.

1 ptsFair
Student constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal.

0 ptsPoor
Student provided no response to a peer’s post.

2 pts

Total Points: 10

Create a reply for a discussion using APA 7 format, and scholarly references no older than 5 years.

Please ensure that the Discussion includes more than 200 words with scholarly articles, and the plagiarism level must remain below 20%.

For the treatment of diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2 and obesity the pharmacology has noted significant advances in these fields. There are two new medications to come on the endocrinology scenario that are called Mounjaro (tripeptide) and Ozempic (semaglutide) because of their efficacy in these conditions DM type 2 and obesity. Both drugs are glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, which imitate the natural GLP-1 hormone that helps to control the blood sugar and appetite. Like drugs, they have detailed differences: their mechanisms of action and the variety of conditions they treat will have clinical implications for their use in endocrine disorders. An important similarity between Mounjaro and Ozempic is that they act on the GLP-1 receptor, which helps regulate insulin liberation and glucagon release in response to food intake. This is about better blood sugar control. Thus, these are highly effective in treating type 2 diabetes (Latif et al., 2021). Moreover, both drugs help in weight loss, which is a key of the managing obesity frequently associated with type 2 diabetes. Clinical investigation of these two medications have shown that they guide the substantial decreases in HbA1c (a marker of long-term blood sugar control) and body weight and, therefore, are beautiful treatment options for patients with both conditions.

However, the principal difference with the Mounjaro and Ozempic is how they work. Mounjaro, in the manuscript, was described as a doble agonist of the GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor (Zheng et al., 2024). Another hormone that regulates insulin and glucose metabolism is Mounjaro, and it has the added capacity to target both GLP-1 and GIP receptors, expanding its potential effect on reducing blood sugar and weighing down on our overall body weight more than a single GLP1 receptor agonist like Ozempic. Its enhanced signal is expected to guide to more effective treatment options for type 2 diabetes and maturity-related conditions.

There are many clinical implications and differences for healthcare providers using Mounjaro or Ozempic for the patients. Compared to other options, Mounjaro is more likely to be better for someone with more extreme type 2 diabetes or obesity because it has higher efficacy when it comes to both lowering blood sugar and weight loss (Zheng et al., 2024). While Ozempic is generally better studied, it has a better safety and efficacy profile, which you may prefer over the GLP 1 receptor agonists in patients who do well with them or patients who require a more well-studied medication. Both drugs can cause gastrointestinal problems, but Mounjaro’s dual activity might carry a very slightly higher chance of problems. Consequently, these medications will be compared, and finally, the choice will be made based on the patient’s characteristics (response and tolerance to the possible side effects of treatment and the severity of the condition).

Mounjaro and Ozempic are both efficacious, but both hold potential clinical complications. The risk of pancreatitis inflammation of the pancreas is one primary concern because GLP-1 receptor agonists have been associated with pancreatitis (Ayoub et al., 2025). Patients with pancreatitis background should be provided these drugs, and they should be closely monitored. In fact, another gastrointestinal symptom such nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea are very frequent, and some patients have more serious side effects that make difficult for patient to follow the treatment. Compared to Ozempic, Mounjaro’s dual action might make stomach pain more likely.

References

Ayoub, M., Chela, H., Amin, N., Hunter, R., Anwar, J., Tahan, V., & Daglilar, E. (2025). Pancreatitis Risk Associated with GLP-1 Receptor Agonists, Considered as a Single Class, in a Comorbidity-Free Subgroup of Type 2 Diabetes Patients in the United States: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(3), 944. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030944

Latif, W., Lambrinos, K. J., & Rodriguez, R. (2021). Compare and contrast the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK572151/

Zheng, Z., Zong, Y., Ma, Y., Tian, Y., Pang, Y., Zhang, C., & Gao, J. (2024). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor: mechanisms and advances in therapy. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 9(1), 234. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-024-01931-z