Case Study 2.1
Case Study:
You have just been hired to perform digital investigations and forensics analysis for a company. You find that no policies, processes, or procedures are currently in place. Conduct research to find information, and then create a policy and process document (3 to 4 pages in length) to provide the structure necessary for your lab environment. Be sure to cite your online sources and follow APA formatting.
Writing Requirements
- 3–4 pages in length (excluding cover page, abstract, and reference list)
- At least two peer reviewed sources that are properly cited and referenced
- APA format, Use the APA template located in the Student Resource Center to complete the assignment.
- Please use the Case Study Guide as a reference point for writing your case study.
Case Study 3.1
Establish a procedure for your organization on how to validate a new forensics software package. Write 3 to 4 pages outlining the procedure you plan to use in your lab. Be sure to cite references, such as the ISO standard or NIST, to support your procedure. Make sure you use APA formatting.
Writing Requirements
- 3–4 pages in length (excluding cover page, abstract, and reference list)
- Include at least two peer reviewed sources that are properly cited
- APA format, Use the APA template located in the Student Resource Center to complete the assignment.
- Please use the Case Study Guide as a reference point for writing your case study.
Case Study 2.1
Address the six questions associated with the chapter two Case study, “From Steve Jobs to Tim Cook – Apple” on page 23 in a three to five page paper (excluding title, abstract, and reference pages). Include at least three peer reviewed sources found in the Potomac Library properly cited and referenced. Assignment must be in 7th edition APA compliance.
Please use this strategy when you analyze a case:
- Identify and write the main issues found discussed in the case (who, what, how, where and when (the critical facts in a case).
- List all indicators (including stated “problems”) that something is not as expected or as desired.
- Briefly analyze the issue with theories found in your textbook or other academic materials. Decide which ideas, models, and theories seem useful. Apply these conceptual tools to the situation. As new information is revealed, cycle back to sub steps a and b.
- Identify the areas that need improvement (use theories from your textbook)
- Specify and prioritize the criteria used to choose action alternatives.
- Discover or invent feasible action alternatives.
- Examine the probable consequences of action alternatives.
- Select a course of action.
- Design and implementation plan/schedule.
- Create a plan for assessing the action to be implemented.
- Conclusion (every paper should end with a strong conclusion or summary)