Contingency Planning

Contingency PlanningContingency planning is a risk mitigation process for developing back-up plans in anticipation of events (scenarios) that might disrupt ‘business as usual’. Business continuity planning is an expanded version of contingency planning that typically encompasses a more comprehensive and extended response plan for getting back to ‘business as usual’. In a well-formatted, highly-detailed research paper, address the need to contingency planning, ensuring to address the following items:(1) Benefits of scenario events/planning.
(2) Questions to consider when implementing scenario planning.
(3) The common types of scenario planning.Your paper should meet these requirements:

  • Be approximately four to six pages in length, not including the required cover page and reference page.
  • Follow APA 7 guidelines. Your paper should include an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a conclusion.
  • Support your answers with the readings from the course and at least two scholarly journal articles to support your positions, claims, and observations, in addition to your textbook. The UC Library is a great place to find resources.
  • Be clearly and well-written, concise, and logical, using excellent grammar and style techniques. You are being graded in part on the quality of your writing.

ISO

 

From your research, discuss whether or not your organization has ISO 27001 certification. Outside of overall protection from cyber-attacks, describe, in detail, some other benefits your organization will achieve in obtaining this certification. If your company does not have this certification, how can they go about obtaining it?

Present your discussion post as if you were presenting to senior leaders of your company.

Please make your initial post and two response posts substantive. A substantive post will do at least TWO of the following:

  • Provide extensive additional information on the topic
  • Explain, define, or analyze the topic in detail
  • Share an applicable personal experience
  • Provide an outside source (for example, an article from the UC Library) that applies to the topic, along with additional information about the topic or the source (please cite properly in APA)
  • Make an argument concerning the topic.

At least one scholarly source should be used in the initial discussion thread. Be sure to use information from your readings and other sources from the UC Library. Use proper citations and references in your post.

Physical security- failed

 Physical security Failed – 5 pages APA format – No plagarism

 

For this Homework Assignment:

Search the Internet for an article where physical security failed:

  • Propose a possible change in that organization’s physical security that could have prevented the breach/failure for that scenario
  • Submit at least 5 full pages double spaced (not including your required cover page, reference pages, abstract, or table of contents)
  • No photos or graphs
  • Reference all sources used
  • Your paper must be APA formatted (including a separate cover page and reference page) 
  • Your paper must include at least 2 references that are properly cited inside the body of your paper and listed in your reference section

Order # 10265

Title: ics (human factors web) homework -2800

Paper type Coursework

Paper format MLA

Course level High School

Subject Area Other (Not listed)

# pages 3   ( or 900 words Minimum)

Spacing Double Spacing

# sources 0

Paper Details

Assignment #5 – group project continued

You will continue this assignment with the same group you worked with on the last assignment.

If you have any major problems or issues in your group, please contact the instructor ASAP.

Overview of Assignment 5 and Assignment 6

For this assignment and the next one, you will continue the (re)design of the web site you chose in the last assignment. This (re)design process will span both assignments. Here is an overview of the entire process:

Assignment 5: Decide on what aspect(s) of your site you will (re)design, and build a prototype – this should be based on usability issues you found in Assignment # 4.

Assignment 6: Run user tests on your (re)design, refine the design based on the tests, build a new prototype, and run another set of user tests.

Assignment 5 Instructions

Step 1: Decide on what aspect(s) of your site you will (re)design. You will probably consider some combination of page design and navigation. Thinking in terms of user tasks, you should probably focus on a task or combination of tasks that should ideally take the user from three to five minutes; that’s long enough to be interesting but short enough to make creating the prototype and running the user tests manageable. If you have concerns over whether the aspects you have chosen are “enough” (or too much), send a message to the TAs or instructor or use Piazza.

Step 2: Sketch a number of possible re-designs on paper. Each person in your group should do at least 3 different sketches (on paper) for possible (re)designs of your site. These can be either visual (layout) or process (flow through the task) kinds of sketches. Use your HCI notebooks for inspiration. You should do these separately, and then compare your ideas. Think of this as visual brainstorming. Choose one sketch that will be the basis for the (re)design, or create a new composite sketch that gives a quick sense of what your (re)design will be.

Step 3: Using a prototyping tool of your choice (e.g., Balsamiq, Moqups, etc.), create a prototype of your (re)design. Your prototype should include all the alternative clicks/entries/actions/displays that the user may see or need while working through the task(s) (from Step 1) using the prototype.

Deliverables:

Include your Assignment #4 with Assignment #5. Consider it the same document for Assignments #4, #5 and #6 – essentially a design and evaluation report that you might create if you were doing this in a company. As such, consider a table of contents and/or good headings to make it clear what the different sections of the document are. See the section below for more on writing design reports. (overall form, layout, design of the document: 5 points)

Part A (10 points)

(about 200-300 words)

A description of the aspect of your site you decided to (re)design in Step 1 (3 points)

A detailed description of the task(s) you expect the user to be able to carry out in your prototype (7 points)

Part B (30 points)

The sketches that you produced in Step 2. Use a scanner or camera to capture the paper sketches, and paste into your document. These don’t need to be great quality, just good enough to read. Make sure the team member’s name is on the sketches she or he created. You should have a minimum of 9 sketches (3 per person). Also indicate/include the “final” sketch that was the basis for your prototype. (approximately 3 points for each sketch plus 3 extra points for the “final” sketch)

Part C (25 points)

Your prototype (all pages) from Step 3.

Part D (15 points)

(about 300-400 words)

A brief description of how your prototype works. If it is a redesign, what is different from the original? (5 points)

What issues were you trying to address in the design? (5 points)

How does your design represent the users/stakeholders you described in Assignment 4? (5 points)

Submit these materials as PDF(s) via Canvas. Make sure the document(s) include your team name and all the names of all your group members on first page of document (name the file “Lastname1_Lastname2_Lastname3_ICS4_HW5”)

A Note on Prototypes

Your prototype needs to be detailed enough that we are able to use them for usability testing in Assignment #6. That means that simple black-and-white wireframes that show layout but no content are probably not detailed enough. On the other hand, a fully realized web page is more detail than you need. Your prototypes should be somewhere in the middle.

These videos shows usability tests using paper prototypes. They offer a good sense of how detailed a prototype should be:

http://youtu.be/9wQkLthhHKA?t=1m20s

http://youtu.be/ppnRQD06ggY?t=98 (not great quality on this one, but enough to see what’s going on)

One caveat about the level of detail: if you are making a claim that more color, better imagery, better alignment, etc. will produce a better user experience with your site, you will need to provide more detail about those aspects, enough that we are able to recognize and evaluate the claims. In other words, the more important the feature is to your overall design, the more detail you will need to provide.

Writing Design/Evaluation Reports

A design report is a document that summarizes what you did on a design project. It is often used in organizations as a way to document the process and decisions made during a design project. In this class, Assignments #4, #5, and #6 together will form the meat of the design report (the complete report will be your deliverable for Assignment #6). There are many different formats for design reports, and many organizations have more formal processes for creating them, but they have a similar generic structure with three main sections:

Section 1: Describe the problem and background for the project. In a user-centered design project, this will include a lot of information about the stakeholders of the system. This section corresponds to Assignment #4.

Section 2: Describe the design itself and the process through which it was developed. This section corresponds to Assignment #5.

Section 3: Describe the evaluation of the design and any resulting changes. This section corresponds to Assignment #6.

You may also have additional sections including a title page, table of contents, or executive summary at the front, and lists of references, illustrations or appendices at the end.

For a nice guide to writing design reports, check out http://www.me.umn.edu/education/undergraduate/writing/How-to-write-a-Design-Report.pdf. It comes out of a mechanical engineering discipline, but is mostly applicable here. The style of report they describe is more detailed and slightly different from what we’ll be doing (e.g. their prototype description is in the evaluation section, whereas we have it in the design section), but overall it is a good overview.

attachment:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1pSM7wxUr6cZd1FJzQGq-BfVTLgA7zDt2?usp=sharing

assignment 10/24

 

Review the video below and write a two page review plus cover page and reference page.  The first page of your paper should be a summary of the video.  The second page is an opinion page covering how your company does or should use these best practices.

Disaster Recovery Best Practices (Youtube.com)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4ae8cqtZHc

The Use of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) in a Manufacturing Company

Overview:

SAP is an enterprise resource planning (ERP) manufacturing software that offers

industry-specific functionalities designed to help midsize companies boost operational

efficiency, strengthen customer relationships and enhance business agility. The use of

ERP encourages an integrated view of business processes to better manage financials,

inventory, human resources, product development, sales, and marketing.

Instructions:

Imagine a manufacturing company that is using a centralized system based on ERP, for

example, SAP. Based on what you know from your own company or from the materials,

write a short paper focusing on the following points:

• The advantages of a centralized system.

• The supply chain management (SCM) and its interaction with the strategic

information system (SIS).

• The company’s customer relationship management (CRM) and how they are

managing their relationship with their vendors.

Requirements:

• This assignment is a paper consisting of 2-3-pages, using APA formatting and

citations.

• Include at least two resources.

Be sure to read the criteria by which your work will be evaluated before you write

and again after you write.

I am currently unable to do more than what I am offering. If you can not do it I understand. Please do not ask for more than what I can currently afford. 

Thank You!

Discussion Post

This assignment is related to Computer science.

Why is using specific nomenclature important?  Back up your reasoning with at least two references not including the textbook. 

Discussion should be at least 250 words.

Reply to two of your classmates’ discussions. These post should be at least 100 words

Points are given for thoughtful and interesting comments. 

Summary

Topics

–  ‘ Research, identify, and briefly describe the evolution of information systems infrastructure. ‘.

– The summary should be 300 words with a minimum of 2 research papers as a reference.

– There should be no plagiarism, attach a plagiarism report with 0% similarity index