Week 2 Discussion due 11/4/20 

Week 3 – 8 discussions due 11/11/20

250 – 300 words

APA format

Turnitin

Week 5 Assignment

Assignment:
Academic Success and Professional Development Plan

Part 3:
Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics

Nurse-scholars
have a significant obligation to their community as well. Their work must have
academic and professional integrity. Their efforts are designed to add to the
body of knowledge, advance the profession, and ultimately help in the care of
patients. Work that lacks integrity is subject to erode quickly or worse.

Fortunately,
there are strategies and tools that can help ensure integrity in academic and
professional work. This Assignment asks you to consider these tools and how you
might apply them to your own work.

In this
Assignment you will continue developing your Academic Success and Professional
Development Plan by appending the original document you began in the previous
assignment.

To Prepare:

Reflect on
the strategies presented in the Resources for this Module in support of
academic style, integrity, and scholarly ethics.

Reflect on
the connection between academic and professional integrity.

The
Assignment:

Part 3,
Section 1: Writing Sample: The Connection Between Academic and Professional
Integrity

Using the
Academic and Professional Success Development Template you began in Module 1
and expanded in Module 2, write a 2- to 3-paragraph analysis that includes the
following:

Explanation
for the relationship between academic integrity and writing

Explanation
for the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics

Cite at
least two resources that support your arguments, being sure to use proper APA
formatting.

Use
Grammarly and SafeAssign to improve the product.

Explain how
Grammarly, Safe Assign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity.

Part 3,
Section 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work

Expand on your
thoughts from Section 1 by:

identifying
and describing strategies you intend to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics
of your: (1) academic work as a student of the MSN program and (2) professional
work as a nurse throughout your career. Include a review of resources and approaches
you propose to use as a student and a professional.

Note: Add
your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Module
1 Assignment, which was built from the Academic Success and Professional
Development Plan Template.

instructions from my professor:

Pick a Topic from the list of Diseases discussed (I picked Herpes Zoster (Shingles). You are to do a PowerPoint presentation using the following headings below. 

Present a typical patient with this disease process and how they would present to the office and how you would work up, diagnose, and treat. 

Pictures and or other visual media are encouraged. You will be graded on professionalism and content. 

Minimum of 15, Maximum of 20 slides and minimum 15 Minutes and maximum 20 minutes presentation. 

Slides must be colorful and professional, use of pictures, charts, graphs, and other enhancements to make the presentation better are encouraged.

(No slide transition animations please) 

All presentations will be submitted into Turn it in, so please make sure that all work is of your own, no recycling past student presentations or copy-paste from the internet should be allowed and it will be considered an academic dishonesty. 

Presentations must include a Slides with the following information.

·       TITLE (slide 1) 

·       DESCRIPTION (Patient information) (slide 2 etc. and so on)

·       EPIDEMIOLOGY

·       ETIOLOGY

·       RISK FACTORS

·       ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS

·       HISTORY

·       PHYSICAL EXAM

·       DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

·       TESTS

·       TREATMENT

·       PROGNOSIS

·       REFERENCES

NOTE: please follow my professor instructions exactly as assigment.

            plagiarism is not tolerated.

            I attached these instructions with highlight points and also an example pptx my professor sent as a.                   guide.

            between 15 and 20 slides.

Soap Note 2 Chronic Conditions

Pick any Chronic Disease: use Diabetes

Must use the sample template for your soap note

Follow the Soap Note Rubric as a guide

Use APA format and must include minimum of 2 Scholarly Citations.

Copy paste from websites or textbooks will not be accepted or tolerated.

The use of templates is ok with regards of Turn it in, but the Patient History, CC, HPI, The Assessment and Plan should be of your own work and individualized to your made up patient. 

Theory Critique Nursing.

Please follow APA style 7th edition. 

Rubric and article to use for references attached (Article from Pg 447 to 455)

Minimum of 350 words with at least 2 peer review reference in 7th edition apa style.

 As a practice scholar, you are called to respond to a recurring medication administration error at your workplace setting and identify strategies to prevent future recurrence through interprofessional collaborative practice. Your first step is to assemble the interprofessional team. Consider the following.

• Who is on your team? What are the roles, responsibilities, and abilities of the team members?
• How will you work together? How will you determine accountability and task distribution? Identify ways to distribute and follow up on tasks among interprofessional team members.
• What strategies will you use to facilitate effective communication and collaboration? 

Make a list of nursing diagnoses and expected outcomes for the following clients:

• A mother brings her son to a clinic for a checkup. She tells the nurse that she is concerned because her 4-year-old son is having trouble with his speech and is repeating words and syllables in his sentences.
• Parents of a 3-year-old girl bring her to their pediatrician for a visit. They tell the nurse that they are concerned because their daughter will only allow her father to take care of her and wants to be near him all the time.

Module 1 – SLP

LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH EDUCATION AND SECURING FUNDING FOR HEALTH EDUCATION PROGRAMS

One of the first tasks that you may be asked to undertake upon, as a health educator, is to develop a program and to securing funding for the program. As such, the aim of this session long project is to familiarize you with the development of a program and the grant proposal process.

There are two parts to this assignment.

Your Task:

Part I: Identify a health problem to be addressed by the health education intervention for which you will seek funding. This problem should affect a local population in the area in which you work or reside and should be something that lends itself to prevention, e.g., obesity, stroke, diabetes, domestic violence, child abuse, teen pregnancy, fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD), drug abuse, HIV/AIDS, etc. Use the scholarly literature to support your selection of this health problem.

NOTE: Please provide your response in a 2-page essay in which you will identify the problem, define the local population affected by the problem, and state the rationale for proposing a health education intervention to address this problem. Endeavor to use scholarly literature in identifying the problem.

NOTE: Keep in mind that this essay will provide vital information for your concept paper in your next SLP assignment.

Part II: Your project will entail identifying a mini-grant funding opportunity for a hypothetical educational program/project of your choosing and constructing a mini-grant application. Mini-grants are small grants made to support projects, programs, or events related to an area of interest/concern to a funder. Applications for mini-grants are typically shorter than those for traditional grants, making it easier for individuals/organizations new to the grant seeking process to apply for and secure funds.

Conduct an Internet search to identify a mini-grant that could be used to support an intervention to address the health problem you selected in Module 1.

• What is the name of this program (please provide the URL for the web site from which on which the program appears)?
• What are the requirements of this mini-grant program? Specifically,
  • Who can apply? (e.g., individuals, non-profit organizations, anyone?)
  • What types of projects are funded? (e.g., educational, special events, materials development?)
  • What amounts are awarded? (i.e., maximum amount over what period of time?)
  • Of what components should a proposal consist? (e.g., a letter of intent, a project description, a budget?)
  • What is the deadline for submitting a proposal? (i.e., specific deadline or ongoing?)
  • When are applicants notified of the award decision?

Length: Part 1 should be no less than 2 pages.

Length: Part 2 should be no less than 3 pages. Limit set by funding agency requirements relative to the specific mini-grant program.

SLP Assignment Expectations

Assessment and Grading: Your paper will be assessed based on the performance assessment rubric that is linked within the course. Review it before you begin working on the assignment.

The following guidance appears only in Module 1, but it applies to the assignments throughout the course:

File format:   Your work should be prepared using Microsoft Word, PowerPoint, or Excel depending upon the assignment instructions. For assignments requiring video or voice recordings, use media formats that are supported by MyTLC Courses as noted in our Trident Support page.

In-text citations and references: Be sure that all information and ideas in your papers are supported by in-text citations and corresponding references at the end of the paper.

Scholarly sources:   At least three scholarly sources should be included in your paper. Online sources must be limited to credible professional and scholarly publications such as peer-reviewed journal articles, e-books, or specific webpages on websites from a university, government, or nonprofit organization (these have extensions .edu, .gov, or .org). Presenting consumer sources such as e-magazines, newspapers, Wikipedia, WebMD, or other commercial websites (these have extensions .com) as references is not appropriate.

Scholarly writing:   Use an academic paper format, not an essay based on your opinions or experience. Avoid using the first person in writing. Synthesize what you learned from the sources you read; write papers in your own words; and cite sources within the text, as well as include a properly formatted reference list.

Use of direct quotes: Use of direct quotes should be avoided. Only use direct quotes when preserving the exact words of an author is necessary. In the rare instance that directly quoted material is used, it must be properly cited (with quotation marks and page numbers in the in-text citation); quotes should not exceed 5-10% of the total paper content.

Work #1:

Actual work where 2 students given their post on this:

Compare and evaluate in 500 words or more qualitative v quantitative risk assessment.  

Use at least three sources. Use the Research Databases available from the Danforth Library not Google. Include at least 3 quotes from your sources enclosed in quotation marks and cited in-line by reference to your reference list.  Example: “words you copied” (citation) These quotes should be one full sentence not altered or paraphrased. Cite your sources using APA format. Use the quotes in your paragaphs.   Stand alone quotes will not count toward the 3 required quotes.Copying without attribution or the use of spinbot or other word substitution software will result in a grade of 0. 

Write in essay format not in bulleted, numbered or other list format. 

Reply to two classmates’ posting in a paragraph of at least five sentences by asking questions, reflecting on your own experience, challenging assumptions, pointing out something new you learned, offering suggestions. These peer responses are not ‘attaboys’.   

It is important that you use your own words, that you cite your sources, that you comply with the instructions regarding length of your post and that you reply to two classmates in a substantive way (not ‘nice post’ or the like).  Your goal is to help your colleagues write better. Do not use spinbot or other word replacement software. It usually results in nonsense and is not a good way to learn anything. . I will not spend a lot of my time trying to decipher nonsense. Proof read your work or have it edited. Find something interesting and/or relevant to your work to write about.  

Work #2:

1) Please explain why bond prices are subject to changes in interest rates.   

2) Describe the characteristics of a bond and provide an example of a firm or government entity that has recently issued (sold) these securities.

Please find the two attachments. 

1- Discussion Question: How can you guarantee validity and feasibility in your research study with a mixed method?

2- 3 paragraphs 3 sentences each

3- APA style

4- 2 references not older than 2015