For this assignment in at least 200 words explain at least 3 things the US constitution identified and at least 3 things the Articles of Confederation identified.  

Include the title page and reference page (failure to do so will result in a zero for assignment) 

Assignment must be submitted in APA format. 

Total – 100 poits

Professional Leadership Communication and the Practice Scholar Guidelines

Instructions: Doctorate level paper. 5-7 pages. Double spacing, APA format. At least 6 references (must be within 5 years so between 2015/2020) 

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to provide the student with the opportunity to explore and explain verbal, non-verbal, and written communication at the highest professional level. This assignment allows for the assimilation of professional leadership competencies as a doctorally prepared practice scholar. Assignment content supports professional formation, communication, and dissemination of skills relevant to the DNP practice scholar.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

-Differentiate attributes of effective leaders and followers in influencing healthcare. 

-Assimilate attributes for intra-/inter-professional collaboration across healthcare settings (

-Formulate selected strategies for leadership and influence across healthcare systems. 

Preparing the Assignment

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of this assignment. The assignment will include the following components within 5-7 pages (not including title page or reference page):

a. Title Page (Title matches the first-page title)

b. Use the following required Level 1 headings:

i. Verbal Communication Competencies and the Practice Scholar

ii. Non-verbal Communication Competencies and the Practice Scholar

iii. Written Communication Competencies and the Practice Scholar

iv. Conclusion

c. Introduction (Note: Do not use “Introduction” as a heading). Place the paper’s title on the first line.

i. In a brief paragraph, introduce your paper’s topic and establish its importance.

ii. Present a clear purpose statement and a mini-outline, in sentence format, of the paper. The best introductions outline the paper according to the major sections in the assignment guidelines (which are the required level 1 headings for the body of the paper).

d. Verbal Communication Competencies and the Practice Scholar

i. This section describes the leadership competency of verbal communication for the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) practice scholar.

ii. Present your understanding of the components, comportment, and collaborative nature of effective and ineffective verbal communication as a leader.

e. Non-Verbal Communication Competencies and the Practice Scholar

i. This section describes the leadership competency of non-verbal communication for the DNP practice scholar.

ii. Present your understanding of the positive and negative behaviors of non-verbal communication as a leader and examples of each.

f. Written Communication Competencies and the Practice Scholar

i. This section describes the leadership competency of written communication for the DNP practice scholar.

ii. Include your understanding of (a) professional tone & style, (b) use of standard English, and (c) strategies for effective writing as a DNP leader in documents such as emails, memos, curricula vitarum, grant proposals, white papers, poster presentations, project dissemination manuscripts, and other formal written forms of professional leadership communication.

g. Conclusion

i. Recap the paper’s purpose statement and mini-outline criteria.

ii. Draw major conclusions from the body of your paper.

iii. Summarize the importance of effective communication competencies for the DNP leader.

h. Clarity of writing

ix. Use consistent standard English grammar and sentence structure is evident throughout the paper. The sentences and wording should be clear and concise, without slang, colloquialisms, street language, or conversational style.

x. Paper should be generally free of grammar, punctuation, spelling, and typographical errors.

xi. The paper should be organized and use the required Level I Headings headers and others as needed to organize the content.

a. APA Style and Organization

. Format as required in APA o (e.g., font, margins, title page, matching title on the 1st page, running head, level headings, reference pages, etc.).

i. Citations in the text must match the APA format 

ii. (Minimum 6 scholarly sources that match the reference)

iii. References must match APA examples Professional Papers.” (Minimum 6 scholarly sources, must be within 5 years)

  History of incompetent nurses – has it gotten better in the last  50 years? Nurses are getting more education now then they used to – is  this making them more competent. Do nurses rely too much on technology  now to catch their mistakes? What impact has technology had on competent care? What areas has nursing competence  gone up in the last 50 years and what areas has it gone down? Do  hospitals have measurement tools for competence training/testing? 
 

 6) How is medical incompetence measured – medication errors, medical chart mix up ext?  

1)  minimum 6 slides  slides with speaker notes Avoid using large and unnecessary images. Use the slides to provide substantial and objective information

2)¨******APA norms

          All paragraphs must be narrative and cited in the text- each paragraphs

          Bulleted responses are not accepted

          Dont write in the first person 

          Dont copy and pase the questions.

          Answer the question objectively, do not make introductions to your answers, answer it when you start the paragraph

3)****************************** It will be verified by Turnitin (Identify the percentage of exact match of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks) 

********************************It will be verified by SafeAssign (Identify the percentage of similarity of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks)

4) Minimum 6 references per part not older than 5 years

5) Identify your answer with the numbers, according to the question. Start your answer on the same line, not the next

Example:

Q 1. Nursing is XXXXX

Q 2. Health is XXXX

Topic:  The promise of guaranteed health care coverage for all. 

position:  CON/AGAINST

1. Make an introduction to the issue

2. Reflect your stance and explain it

3. Explain the rationale for your stance

4. Describe the ethical principals involved

5. Resalt theories and evidence supporting your position, 

6. Explain your proposed resolution. 

Evaluation Title: Persuasive Speech Topic

Choose a topic for your persuasive speech. Craft a Word document which addresses the following:

• What is your topic?
• Who is your target audience?
• Share examples of logos, pathos, and ethos you will include in the speech.
• What other persuasive techniques and/or appeals will you use?
• How will you avoid defective persuasion?
• Identify a minimum of three research materials you will use as supportive evidence. Include an APA citation as well as a 3-5 sentence summary of each material.
• Share ideas for presentation aids to be used in the speech.

 Topic – Heart Failure ages 27-90

By the due date Assigned, write a 1-2 page paper addressing the sections below of the research proposal.

Methodology   You are to design a study.  

•     Sample/Setting: Number and criteria for inclusion and description of place in which data will be collected.
•     Sampling Strategy
•     Research Design: Type (e.g., Quasi-Experimental), description, and rationale for selection

This is NOT a Research Project but a Quality Improvement Project 

Please do not refer to this project as a study but refer to it as a DPI project

PLEASE FOLLOW THE SAMPLE OF DPI PROJECT ATTACHED

TOPIC: Impact of Medication Administration Errors on 3-4-Year-old Leukemia Patients 

Chapter 2 of the Direct Practice Improvement (DPI) Project Proposal is titled “Literature Review” and expands upon work you completed in DNP-820 in the Develop a Literature Review assignment. Synthesis of the literature in the Literature Review (Chapter 2) defines the key aspects of the learner’s scholarly project, such as the problem statement, population and location, clinical questions, variables or phenomena (if relevant to the project), methodology and design, purpose statement, data collection, and data analysis approaches. The literature selected must illustrate strong support for the learner’s practice change proposal.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

· Locate the “DPI Proposal Template” in the PI Workspace of the DC Network.

· Locate the Develop a Literature Review assignment you completed in DNP-820.

· Locate the “Research Article Chart” resource in the DC network Course Materials.

· Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.

· This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

· You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Directions:

Use the “DPI Proposal Template” and the “Develop a Literature Review” assignment from DNP-820 to develop a draft of a literature review (Chapter 2) for your DPI Project Proposal. The literature review (Chapter 2) is required to be a minimum of 20-25 pages including a minimum of 50 scholarly citations.  You have already completed some of this review in previous courses. No less than 85% of the articles must have been published in the past 5 years. Articles selected must provide strong, reliable support for the proposal.

Use the following DPI proposal template’s criteria to create your draft Literature Review (Chapter 2):

1. Access and review the DPI Project Template for Chapter 2 criteria

o Sections of this Chapter include:

§ Introduction to the Chapter and Background to the Problem

§ Theoretical Foundations

§ Review of Literature including Themes and Sub-themes

§ Summary

2. Using the Clinical Question/PICOT question components, identify at least two themes which will organize the literature review .

3. Identify at least three subthemes that relate to each theme (six subthemes total).

4. Identify at least three empirical or scholarly articles related to each subtheme (18 articles total). At least one article must demonstrate a quantitative methodology.

5. Use the “Research Article Chart” resource as a guide to: (a) analyze and synthesize the literature into your paper, (b) state the article title, (c) identify the author, (d) state the research question(s), (e) identify the research sample, (f) explain the research methodology, (g) identify the limitations in the study, (h) provide the research findings of the study, and (i) identify the opportunities for practice implementation. For scholarly, nonempirical articles, state the article title and author, and provide a brief contextual summary of the article

1. You are going to present data that has been collected to your administrative group. The focus is on outcome measures and the data collected is unplanned readmission rates at two different hospitals. What format would you choose to display your data and why? What information would you include with the data?
   
2. Identify at least two stakeholder agency reporting sources. How do these external reporting groups contribute to or hinder CQI?
   
3. Select an effective current health policy that focuses on or affects population health. What components of this policy make it effective? Conduct research on its history and the factors that influenced its development

The organization for this assignment – Amedisys Hospice of Greater Chesapeake.

After completing your research, prepare your Written Assignment 2 intermediate deliverables (relevant submission folders are in the sub-modules) as directed by the general guidelines for written assignments in the syllabus, project descriptions, by answering each of the following questions in turn:

1. Name and describe the health service organization.
2. Describe its primary target market in terms of the segmentation variables presented in the Week 4 Overview. You can use the PRIZM system or describe it yourself. 
3. What kind of behaviors do its patients/clients exhibit when making a decision to use the organization’s services? Might want to refer to the Health Service Model. 
4. What do you think is the organization’s value proposition?  Use the generic value propositions outlined in the Week 4 Overview.
5. Describe the organization’s primary competitors.  If possible, prepare a positioning map using two variables important to the patients/clients of the organization. 
6. Based on your competitive analysis, what do you is the organization’s competitive position? 
7. What recommendations would you make for changes to the organization’s target market, services or competitive position and why?

For this discussion post, I would like you to observe someone or a group of people in a social environment. How are they behaving? Does their behavior change when they know you are observing? 

Good example: go to the grocery store and just observe people. In the beginning of Corona, people were hoarding resources. Why do you think they were? Do you wonder if their behaviors would change, if they knew they were being observed or told to change?

Please include your the observation specifics about the experiment you chose. Did the people know you were watching them