Summary

Provide a one paragraph summary for the attached word document

No plagiarism 

APA format

sepsis

Lab Analysis Paper on Sepsis

Case Study HESI Mr. Peterson Is To be used for your Lab Paper it gives labs results and follows nursing care planning. Mr. Perterson is a Coronary Artery By-Pass This patient is prone to Hypovolemic Shock as well as at Risk for Sepsis

instructions

Write using APA formatting 

use the lab values attached 

use the attached sample as a guide. tabulate assignment too

Referring to chapter 9 of the attached textbook and the webpage below respond to the questions regarding nurse case management. Due 11/17/2020

  

Referring to chapter 9 of the attached textbook and the webpage below respond to the questions regarding nurse case management. Due 11/17/2020 

1) Visit http://www.cmsa.org/ 

2) 200 words- Explore case management as it relates to population health nursing. 

3) 200 words- Identify consumer-directed information about case managers. 

4) 200 words- How does this information help consumers understand the role of a case manager? 

5) 200 words- How is this information similar or distinguishable from the textbook’s description of a case manager, and/or your own knowledge or observations of the role of a case manager?

6) 200 words- How could you as the nurse case manager use this website? Provide at least 5 examples. 

Essay should be in APA format with subheadings corresponding to each question. Include at least 5 reference. 

Leadership of nursing

Only one or two paragraphs

  • Why is it important for a nurse to advocate for a client even if it means challenging another member of the interprofessional team?

In your discussion with peers, discuss how client advocacy relates to professionalism, ethics, and quality.

Be sure to apply concepts from the readings and research. You must cite at least one source: your textbook, scholarly resources,  in APA Style.

Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews

 Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search for cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of the automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size?

In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected.

To Prepare:

  • Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in part 1 and 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.
  • Use the keywords from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.
  • Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews

Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

  • Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
  • Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
  • Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
  • Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer-reviewed article.
  • Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.

Assignment: Pharmacotherapy for Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders (Advanced Pharm-WK4)

Gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatobiliary disorders affect the structure and function of the GI tract. Many of these disorders often have similar symptoms, such as abdominal pain, cramping, constipation, nausea, bloating, and fatigue. Since multiple disorders can be tied to the same symptoms, it is important for advanced practice nurses to carefully evaluate patients and prescribe a treatment that targets the cause rather than the symptom. Once the underlying cause is identified, an appropriate drug therapy plan can be recommended based on medical history and individual patient factors. In this Assignment, you examine a case study of a patient who presents with symptoms of a possible GI/hepatobiliary disorder, and you design an appropriate drug therapy plan.

To Prepare

· Review the case study assigned by your Instructor for this Assignment

· Reflect on the patient’s symptoms, medical history, and drugs currently prescribed.

· Think about a possible diagnosis for the patient. Consider whether the patient has a disorder related to the gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary system or whether the symptoms are the result of a disorder from another system or other factors, such as pregnancy, drugs, or a psychological disorder.

· Consider an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

Write a 1-page paper that addresses the following:

· Explain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis.

· Describe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

· Justify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide examples.

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. 

Write a 1+ page paper that addresses the following:

1. Explain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis.

2. Describe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

3. Justify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide examples.

Case study assigned: 

Patient HL comes into the clinic with the following symptoms: nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. The patient has a history of drug abuse and possible Hepatitis C. HL is currently taking the following prescription drugs:

· Synthroid 100 mcg daily

· Nifedipine 30 mg daily

· Prednisone 10 mg daily

Describe nursing practice today

 

The field of nursing has changed over time. In a 750‐1,000 word paper, discuss nursing practice today by addressing the following:

  1. Explain how nursing practice has changed over time and how this evolution has changed the scope of practice and the approach to treating the individual.
  2. Compare and contrast the differentiated practice competencies between an associate and baccalaureate education in nursing. Explain how scope of practice changes between an associate and baccalaureate nurse.
  3. Identify a patient care situation and describe how nursing care, or approaches to decision‐making, differ between the BSN‐prepared nurse and the ADN nurse.
  4. Discuss the significance of applying evidence‐based practice to nursing care and explain how the academic preparation of the RN‐BSN nurse supports its application.
  5. Discuss how nurses today communicate and collaborate with interdisciplinary teams and how this supports safer and more effective patient outcomes.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. 

SOCS185N: Culture and Society

Week 6 Discussion: Social Institutions and Health

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Chapters 11, 12, 14
  • Lesson
  • Minimum of 1 outside scholarly source

Initial Post Instructions
For this discussion, we will consider if the social world can be bad for your health and/or if social institutions can improve your health.

For the initial post, examine ways that some of the social institutions studied this week (the family, the educational system, or religions) might affect the health (physical, mental, spiritual) of the people in the institution. Also, consider behaviors, practices, or experiences of specific demographic groups in the United States related to the social institutions studied this week (the family, the educational system, or religions) and examine ways specific demographic groups’ health could be affected positively or negatively.

For the initial post, respond to one of the following options, and label the beginning of your post indicating either Option 1 or Option 2 or Option 3:

  • Option 1:What are some effects of family life on health?
  • Option 2:How might the educational system in the United States affect the health of American children?
  • Option 3: How might health outcomes be affected by religious practices of members of varying religions in the United States? Are there other behaviors, outside of formal religious practice or formal religious ceremonial observances, such as dietary requirements or other behavioral requirements of members of religious institutions in the United States that might affect their health, either directly or indirectly?

Writing Requirements

  • Minimum of 3-4 paragraphs
  • APA format for in-text citations and list of references (3-4 included the book)
  • Include citations from at least the assigned textbook/lesson reading and one additional outside scholarly source to support your response.

Criteria

Content: Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding all weekly concepts.

Evidence & Sources: Integrates evidence to support discussion from assigned readings** OR online lessons, AND at least one outside scholarly source.*** Sources are credited.*

Professional Communication: Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

Scholarly source – per APA Guidelines, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. 

School book to use also as reference: Kendall, D. E. (2018). Sociology in our times: The essentials. Boston MA:   Learning

6026: Assessment 2 Propsal

Assessment 2

  • PRINT
  • Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal
  • Develop a 2–4-page proposal for a policy that should help to improve health care and outcomes for your target population.
    Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.
    Cost and access to care continue to be main concerns for patients and providers. As technology improves our ability to care for and improve outcomes in patients with chronic and complex illnesses, questions of cost and access become increasingly important. As a master’s-prepared nurse, you must be able to develop policies that will ensure the delivery of care that is effective and can be provided in an ethical and equitable manner.
    SHOW LESSBy successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

    • Competency 1: Design evidence-based advanced nursing care for achieving high-quality population outcomes. 
      • Propose a policy and guidelines that will lead to improved outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
    • Competency 2: Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of interprofessional interventions in achieving desired population health outcomes. 
      • Analyze the potential for an interprofessional approach to implementing a proposed policy to increase the efficiency or effectiveness of the care setting to achieve high quality outcomes.
    • Competency 3: Analyze population health outcomes in terms of their implications for health policy advocacy. 
      • Advocate the need for a proposed policy in the context of current outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
    • Competency 4: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards. 
      • Communicate proposal in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
      • Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
    • Competency Map
      CHECK YOUR PROGRESSUse this online tool to track your performance and progress through your course.
  • Toggle DrawerContextAs a master’s-prepared nurse, you have a valuable viewpoint and voice with which to advocate for policy developments. As a nurse leader and health care practitioner, often on the front lines of helping individuals and populations, you are able to articulate and advocate for the patient more than any other professional group in health care. This is especially true of populations that may be underserved, underrepresented, or are otherwise lacking a voice. By advocating for and developing policies, you are able to help drive improvements in outcomes for specific populations. The policies you advocate for could be internal ones (just within a specific department or health care setting) that ensure quality care and compliance. Or they could be external policies (local, state, or federal) that may have more wide-ranging effects on best practices and regulations.
  • Toggle DrawerQuestions to ConsiderAs you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
    SHOW LESSAssessment 2 will build on the health issue, vulnerable population, and position that you started to develop in the first assessment. For Assessment 2, you will develop a proposal for a policy and a set of guidelines that could be implemented to ensure improvements in care and outcomes.

    • What are the relevant best practices from a population health standpoint (cultural competence, disease prevention, and interventions) for your chosen health issue and vulnerable population? 
      • How are these best practices relevant to your chosen health issue and vulnerable population? 
        • Do the best practices make any reference to standards of care or benchmarks that should be achieved?
      • How could these best practices be leveraged to help inform or develop a policy and guidelines to improve care and outcomes for the vulnerable population you are working with?
    • How could technology be used to identify health concerns or collect data that could help health care practitioners determine which health care issues to focus on in a population? 
      • What are the relevant laws, regulations, or policies for employing any of the technology you might find useful?
    • What type of policy and guidelines would be most likely to ensure improvements in care and outcomes related to your chosen health issue and vulnerable population? 
      • Are there any policies in existence that could help inform your own policy development?
      • How might your proposed policy and guidelines influence the way in which care is accessed?
      • How might your proposed policy and guidelines influence the amount of access that is available?
  • Toggle DrawerResourcesAssessment Example
  • Assessment InstructionsScenario
    The analysis of position papers that your interprofessional team presented to the committee has convinced them that it would be worth the time and effort to develop a new policy to address your specific issue in the target population. To that end, your interprofessional team has been asked to submit a policy proposal that outlines a specific approach to improving the outcomes for your target population. This proposal should be supported by evidence and best practices that illustrate why the specific approaches are likely to be successful. Additionally, you have been asked to address the ways in which applying your policy to interprofessional teams could lead to efficiency or effectiveness gains.
    Instructions
    For this assessment you will develop a policy proposal that seeks to improve the outcomes for the health care issue and target population you addressed in Assessment 1. If for some reason you wish to change your specific issue and/or target population, contact your FlexPath faculty.
    The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your submission addresses all of them. You may also want to read the Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal Scoring Guide and Guiding Questions: Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal to better understand how each grading criterion will be assessed.

    • Propose a policy and guidelines that will lead to improved outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
    • Advocate the need for a proposed policy in the context of current outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
    • Analyze the potential for an interprofessional approach to implementing a proposed policy to increase the efficiency or effectiveness of the care setting to achieve high-quality outcomes.
    • Communicate proposal in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
    • Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
    • Example Assessment:You may use the assessment example, linked in the Assessment Example section of the Resources, to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.
      Additional Requirements
    • Length of proposal: 2–4 double-spaced, typed pages, not including title page or reference list. Your proposal should be succinct yet substantive.
    • Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that supports the relevance of or need for your policy, as well as interprofessional considerations. Resources should be no more than five years old.
    • APA formatting: Use the APA Style Paper Template linked in the Resources. An APA Style Paper Tutorial is also provided to help you in writing and formatting your analysis.