MA3010 – Statistics for Health Professions SU20 B – Section D01

Discussion 07.1- Student t-Test

For this discussion forum, refer to the Excel File Discussion 7-1 Data Set that contains information on the following:

Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. The results are shown in the table for the treatment
(with magnets) group and the sham
(or placebo) group. The results are a measure of reduction in back pain. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed
populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal.

1.Identify the worksheet (tab) that matches the first letter of your LAST name (i.e., if your last name were “Fudd” you would use the data from the “F” tab). This will be the source data you will use to answer your remaining questions for this initial post.

2.What is the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis?

3.Identify the test statistic and p-value from your source data.

4.Would you reject or fail to reject your null hypothesis? Explain how you came to this conclusion (i.e. either use the test-statistic or p-value to support your claim).

5.Would there be sufficient evidence (based upon your source data) to support the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment? Explain.

C. H.

ODC 3 DB

Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 400–600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.

Based upon the course readings, supplementary materials, and your own literature search via the CTU online library, create, share, and discuss the following:

• Review and analyze the practitioner literature of organizational learning.
• Provide  at least 2 scholarly resources to support your response. 

Use the LIBRARY or the MGMT Doctoral Library for help.

See attachment 

Please read and respond to the attachment.

Note: Only up to 20% of the content in the written response can be quotes from third parties.  

Write a research paper outlining possible career paths in the field of Human Resources Management (HRM) and, based upon independent research, discuss how different organizations might develop and implement a strategic HRM plan. 

Edit question’s attachments.. 

Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, review this week’s readings and Weekly Lecture.

Prien, Goodstein, Goodstein, and Gamble (2009) defined several tools and techniques for gathering data related to a job. In Week 1, you completed a position questionnaire for a potential job analysis. In addition to a position questionnaire, there are other tools available to gather data and information to support the analysis.

Discovery:

Further explore three of the tools defined by Prien et al., (2009) for data and information collection. Define and explain each of the tools, and provide the reference(s) for the source. Explain how each of these tools would add substance related to the position and credibility to the resulting job analysis.

Determine:

As a human resource manager, choosing the right tool to do the job is part of the skill and responsibility required for successful outcomes. Based on the first letter of your last name, you will review the scenario that you have been assigned to and determine the most appropriate tool(s) for gathering the necessary data and information for a credible job analysis.

Last names A – H

Scenario 1: A call center with 15 customer service representatives that work 8 hour days, with rotating three shifts.

Defend:

Formulate in your own words what this position might look like. Describe the type of information needed to properly analyze the position and how the tool(s) will be deployed to gather the appropriate information. Provide specific reasoning for each tool chosen.

respond to listed statement in at least 170 words. Do you agree or disagree with the statement.

Criminal Justice Leadership in any organization is related to the outmost ssuccess that organization can expect to see. Leadership in any organization is certainly no exception. The main strategy is having strong leaders in place really promotes organization, management, productivity, motivation and even creativity in a criminal justice setting. Leadership requires that a person have a strong desire to be an influential part of the oorganization and want to play a key role in moving towards a common goal.  Leaders are primarily concerned with motivating and inspiring their followers to remain productive and to maintain the drive and ability to reach organization goals (Study Moose, 2016). The role of a leader in a criminal justice organization should not be under appreciated. A leader plays has an immensely influential role within the organization. First, leaders must have a strong working knowledge in the assignment they wish to lead. Leaders must realize their strengths and weakness in order to develop their own style of leadership. Due to the fact that people are motivated by different things, a leader must realize what motivates each subordinate individually (Study Moose, 2016).

The most accomplished leaders comprehend the necessity of setting the tone for employees to be successful.  A good leader wants their employees to enjoy coming to work and they will take the necessary action to create this atmosphere.  This is done by establishing mechanisms to stay informed with what their employees are doing.  Leaders should embrace every opportunity to recognize their employees for positive performance and often it may be a simple “thank you.”  Creating an environment to help your officers feel they are a part of a team and a family will encourage them to not want to let down their team members (Weisskopf, 2012).  (Katz, 2020)

The role of the leadership in criminal justice organization in the motivation of their team members is to make their team members feel wanted. The leader should ensure that they have an open door policy with their team members, so that if an employee is ever feeling uncomfortable, unappreciated, underpaid and overworked, they can express themselves. It is the job of the leader to ask the employee, “What can I do for you? What would you like to see change?’ Ensure that the employee recognizes that they matter, too and the organization could not run without them. Think of an organization as a human body. The employer is the head, but the employees are the neck. Both need each other and the head will not and cannot move without the neck.

PURPOSE OF ASSIGNMENT

The objective of this assignment is to apply the principles and concepts of security as enterprise architecture by extending upon the material described in the Archisurance case study.

ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS

Write a paper explaining how Archisurance should address security within each layer of its enterprise architecture. Include in your discussion descriptions of the specific business, operational, and cyber-security risks that need to be managed and suggestions for how these might be managed.

FORMATTING AND STYLE REQUIREMENTS

· Submissions should be between 750 words and 1,000 words in length.

· Refer to the UCOL Format and Style Requirements (Links to an external site.) on the Course Homepage, and be sure to properly cite your sources using Turabian Author-Date style citations (Links to an external site.).

·  

·  

·  

·  

·  

Rubric

Small Paper Rubric

Small    Paper Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a   Learning OutcomeContent 

70.0 to >60.0 pts 

Excellent Work

Student demonstrates thorough understanding of the     topic. Incorporates material from the assigned readings and from his/her     experience. Specific examples are used to amplify key points. Demonstrates     critical thinking skills in analyzing key concepts.

60.0 to >49.0 pts 

Meets Standard

Student demonstrates understanding of the topic.     Incorporates some material from reading and/or personal experiences. Some     critical thinking skills applied.

49.0 to >35.0 pts 

Needs Improvement

Student demonstrates some understanding of the topic.     Few or no references to reading material or personal experience.

35.0 to >0 pts 

Needs Significant Improvement

Student did not demonstrate understanding of the topic.     No references to reading material or personal experience.

70.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a   Learning OutcomeClarity 

20.0 to >16.0 pts 

Excellent Work

Paper is structured in a logical manner, with     appropriate subheadings to facilitate reading. Arguments are clear and     backed with facts. Few, if any, unsubstantiated assertions.

16.0 to >14.0 pts 

Meets Standard

Paper is structured logically. Some unsubstantiated     arguments and/or assertions.

14.0 to >10.0 pts 

Needs Improvement

Paper is not structured logically. Many unsubstantiated     arguments and/or assertions.

10.0 to >0 pts 

Needs Significant Improvement

Paper lacks structure. Unsubstantiated arguments and/or     assertions.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a   Learning OutcomeGrammar, References, UCOL   Style Guide 

10.0 to >8.5 pts 

Excellent Work

Writing follows accepted English grammar practices. No     spelling or grammar errors, Use of Turabian and proper citation references     and/or use of UCOL Style Guide used appropriately.

8.5 to >7.0 pts 

Meets Standard

Writing follows accepted English grammar practices. Not     more than 3 grammatical errors. Use of Turabian and proper citation for     references and/or use of UCOL Style Guide needs improvement.

7.0 to >5.0 pts 

Needs Improvement

Writing deviates from accepted English grammar     practices. 5 or more grammatical errors. Use of Turabian and proper     citation for references and/or use of UCOL Style Guide needs improvement.

5.0 to >0 pts 

Needs Significant Improvement

Poor English grammar practices. Many grammatical errors.     Use of Turabian and proper citations and/or use of UCOL Style Guide lacking.

10.0 pts

Total   Points: 100.0

Instructions for Capstone Project Assignment Part 2

Now that you have your approved idea for the project it is time to begin the second part of the project, which builds on Project Part 1. Using the same company of choice that is proposing an expansion opportunity overseas, conduct research on the country. Specifically focus on the culture and cultural exchange. For the culture, review the web site http://geert-hofstede.com/ to compare the cultural differences between the countries. Identify the cultural differences and consider the cultural exchange. In addition, research and choose the best distributions method: Product/Market, Pricing, and Positioning.

Identify the following:

• Cultural differences
• Cultural exchange
• Distribution Methods

Submission Requirements:

Submit a two- to three-page Word document using 12-pt. font and APA format

*** Please use attached paper to complete the assignment. This is a continuation of the paper you completed for me on Nordsee. You will use the same company for this assignment.

At the turn of the 20th century, Georges Rouault’s art underwent  profound change as a result of a shift in his moral and religious  outlook.

In Chapter 5 of your text:

• Read “Religious Art for a Modern Age: Georges Rouault,” pages 100–101. 
• View Rouault’s Jesus Reviled, above, and in Figure 5.17 on page 101.

Please respond to the following in a post of 150 to 200 words:  

• Describe your reaction to Jesus Reviled in light of Rouault’s profound interaction with the culture of his time. In your response be sure to consider:   
  • How do an artist’s religious or moral beliefs affect the art he or she produces?
  • How do your religious or moral beliefs affect the way you see Rouault’s Jesus Reviled?